oil and gas accounting methods

The development of forward- or current-year metrics, however, often requires a time-consuming review of press releases and other sources of information. The oilfield services segment can also be considered a distinct segment, which serves the upstream oil and gas companies. In its “Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 19,” the FASB requires that oil and gas companies use the SE method. In other words, these two governing bodies have yet to find the ideological common ground needed to establish a single accounting approach. ​This annual publication provides an update on accounting, tax, and regulatory matters relevant to the oil and gas industry.

oil and gas accounting methods

Geological and geophysical costs can include costs of studies conducted such as seismic surveys of underground formations. Oil and gas companies spend a lot of money exploring new untapped reservoirs without any guarantee that they will find anything. Costs include acquiring land, obtaining the necessary permissions to extract, buying or leasing relevant equipment, transportation, and paying a specialist workforce’s wages. Oil and gas can often oil and gas accounting be tricky industries to navigate, but luckily, we have had years of experience in helping businesses within this sector attain maximum success. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issues guidance in the Accounting Standards Codification® (ASC®) for Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) in the United States. The first main difference is how accounting is handled for the drilling of an unsuccessful, exploratory well.

Buy single article

Work with an experienced team to understand what financial statements are absolutely vital to review on a periodic basis and an idea of what numbers will look like and what to expect. Deciphering income statements and cash flow can often be challenging with either method, so it is imperative to have a team in place that has the right expertise to help you charter that territory successfully. It is important to understand the bottom line for the two of these and how they may affect your financial statements. Understanding that is vital to know how productive operations really are – both day-to-day and the big picture of the business. This is because adding back the non-cash charge for DD&A effectively negates the relatively larger impact to net income under the FC accounting method.

Successful efforts are more focused on the end product and believe only those expenses incurred to find and produce oil and gas should be capitalized. As such, in evaluating valuations for midstream companies, consideration should be given to yield data and trends for the subject company. Amid the current downturn in oil and gas commodity prices and the decline of the industry overall, midstream public companies’ yields have increased, but these higher yields are due primarily to lower valuations rather than to growth in distributions. Oilfield services companies are important industry players that provide support services — drilling, cementing, surveying, treating (e.g., with acids or chemicals), and perforating — to upstream oil and gas producers on a fee or contract basis. An increasingly popular way in recent years for companies to extract oil and gas from shale formations, such as the Permian Basin in West Texas, the Bakken Formation in North Dakota, and the Eagle Ford in South Texas, is hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking”. Examples of large oilfield services companies include Halliburton Company, Schlumberger Limited, and National Oilwell Varco.

Accounting for extractive activities – Oil & gas

The Market Approach may also be an appropriate method of valuing an E&P company, depending on the availability of comparable publicly traded companies or M&A transactions (at either the asset level or the entity level). When analyzing historical or projected financial metrics to use in the Market Approach, consideration should be given to some unique aspects related to the accounting of E&P companies. Financial statements of E&P companies prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) may use either successful efforts or full-cost accounting for oil and gas reserves. These accounting methods differ in their treatment of specific operating expenses — namely, exploration costs related to carrying and retaining undeveloped properties, collecting and analyzing geophysical and seismic data, and drilling exploratory wells.

  • Crack spread is the differential between the price of crude oil and the price of petroleum products extracted from it — that is, the profit margin a refinery can expect when it “cracks” crude oil.
  • Conventional variations of the Income and Market approaches (e.g., DCF and EBITDA-based multiples) may be appropriate in valuing midstream E&P companies, which are frequently incorporated as master limited partnerships (“MLPs”).
  • Oil and gas operations have some of the most unique accounting issues found in any industry.
  • However, such a comparison also points out the impact on periodic results caused by differing levels of capitalized assets under the two accounting methods.
  • The vast majority of MLPs are pipeline businesses, which generally earn stable income from the transport of oil, gasoline or natural gas.

This paper utilizes secondary sources of data and Structural-Functionalism to explain the role of Nigerian state in the petroleum industry. The findings from this paper reveal that, the state has introduced a number of policy measures to enhance the efficiency and productivity of the petroleum industry such as deregulation/privatization, subsidy and the Petroleum Industry Bill. However, unless the country deepens its economic reform initiatives to include effective diversification of the petroleum sector, the performance of the economy will continue its unimpressive trend. Diversification of the economy should also extend beyond the Petroleum sector so that the country can become a major force in the emergent global economic order of the 21st century.

Firms & Groups

This course delves into acquisition, exploration, development, and production activities, covering many industry-specific accounting issues. This paper examines the value relevance of two alternative accounting methods for exploration and development (E&D) expenditures for oil and gas firms. I find that full cost (FC) accounting data is more value-relevant than successful efforts (SE) accounting data. Further analysis reveals that the smooth earnings provided by the FC method contributes to the higher value relevance of the FC method. This study concludes that a policy of full capitalization of expenditures with uncertain future economic benefits better summarizes information relevant to investors relative to a policy of partial capitalization. Because successful efforts and full cost impact the balance sheet and income statement differently, the method of accounting impacts the comparability of companies who use different methods.

oil and gas accounting methods

Oil & Gas Accounting delves into acquisition, exploration, development, and production activities, covering many industry-specific accounting issues. The financial results of a manufacturing company are impacted by depreciation expense for plant, property, and equipment. The charges include the depreciation of certain long-lived operating equipment, the depletion of costs relating to the acquisition of property or property mineral rights, and the amortization of tangible non-drilling costs incurred with developing the reserves. The effect of choosing one accounting method over another is apparent when periodic financial results involving the income and cash flow statement are compared. Each method highlights the individual costs, which fall into the categories of acquisition, exploration, development, and production, differently.

The update discusses matters critical to oil and gas entities, including updates to SEC, FASB, and tax guidance with a specialized focus on the oil and gas industry. In Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 19, the FASB requires that oil and gas companies use the SE method. These two governing bodies have yet to find the ideological common ground needed to establish a single accounting approach. Figure 3 presents the variations in EBITDA valuation multiples for the different types of oilfield services companies. Until an impairment occurs, reported profit levels can appear to be deceivingly elevated, since the expense recognition for so many costs has been deferred to a future date.

Rather than considering EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) as a primary pricing metric for E&P companies, analysts usually consider EBITDAX, which is a company’s EBITDA before exploration costs for successful efforts. For full-cost firms, exploration costs are embedded in depreciation and depletion, so EBITDAX equalizes both accounting types. Companies record exploration costs capitalized under either method on the balance sheet as part of their long-term assets. This is because, like the machinery used by a manufacturing company, oil and natural gas reserves are considered productive assets for an oil and gas company. Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) require that companies charge costs to acquire those assets against revenues as they use the assets. Oil and gas operations have some of the most unique accounting issues found in any industry.

Statement of Cash Flows

Examples of global E&P companies include Exxon Mobil Corporation, Royal Dutch Shell plc, and BP plc. The full cost (FC) method is an accounting system used specifically by extractive industries such as oil and gas companies. Under this technique, all exploration operating costs are capitalized, regardless of whether they were successful or not, and then amortized into expenses over time as the total reserves are produced. Each method will have its own way of demonstrating costs when it comes to cash flow, so it is crucial to understand the methods in depth in order to anticipate what financial statements will look like. This is why it is incredibly important to work with a financial team that really understands the oil and gas industry in order to gain a full understanding of the business and its financial health – both short-term and long-term. CFO is basically net income with non-cash charges like DD&A added back, so, despite a relatively lower charge for DD&A, CFO for an SE company will reflect the net income impact from expenses relating to unsuccessful exploration efforts.

  • These budget reductions directly impact clients’ demand for an oilfield services company’s products.
  • Some choose to view this as the discovery being the true need, which means that all operational costs incurred during the discovery process should be counted – which is where the full cost method comes in.
  • While FASB does not require companies to use successful efforts to conform with GAAP, they do not provide guidance on the full cost method.
  • Another important factor affecting the crack spread is the relative proportion of various petroleum products produced by a refinery.
  • In an environment of lower commodity prices, such as the one we are currently experiencing, E&P companies significantly cut their capital expenditure budgets related to exploring and producing oil and gas.
  • Examples of large midstream companies include Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Kinder Morgan Inc., and TransCanada Corporation.